A grievance was filed at Mumbai’s Oshiwara police office against Nana Patekar and creator Ganesa Acharya.Tanushree Dutta, UN agency suspect Nata Patekar of sexually harassing her on the sets of her film ‘Horn Ok Pleassss’ in 2008, has finally taken the legal route. The role player registered a grievance against Nana at Mumbai’s Oshiwara police office on Saturday.
She conjointly named creator Ganesa Acharya in her grievance.
She confirmed the news with a post on her Twitter handle with a caption that scan, “Today filed a complained in Oshiwara police office, in reference to 2008 picture show set incident against Nana Patekar and Ganesa Acharya”.
Today filed a complain in Oshiwara police office, in reference to 2008 picture show set incident against Nana Patekar and Ganesa Acharya.
As of now, the police haven’t registered associate degree FIR within the case.
In the meanwhile, on being asked what took Tanushree over ten years to file a grievance on the matter, advocate Nitin Satpute told news organisation cuckoo that the role player had tried to register a case against Patekar, Acharya and director Rakesh Sarang and producer Sami Siddiqui in 2008. However, the police created a fool of her by registering solely a case against the incident of attack on her vehicle. The police did not mention anyone’s name within the grievance.
“Since Tanushree did not apprehend Mahratti, she was unaware of it. Moreover, she was conjointly in depression thanks to the harassment that she had undergone thanks to these individuals. currently that she has recovered she set to require action and registered a case against them,” Satpute aforementioned.
“The case has been registered underneath Section — 354, 354 (A), thirty four and 509 of the Indian legal code. we’ve got all proof of the incident and that we can move to tribunal if correct action isn’t taken by the police,” he said.
Tanushree Dutta had tried to lodge associate degree FIR against Nana Patekar, Ganesa Acharya&the director&producer of the picture show in ’08 however police created fool of her by registering a case solely against the incident of attack on her vehicle&didn’t mention anyone’s name.
Since she does not apprehend Mahratti she was unaware of it. Moreover, she was conjointly in depression thanks to the harassment that she had undergone thanks to these individuals. currently that Tanushree has recovered she set to require action®istered a case against them.
The case has been registered underneath section – 354, 354 (A), thirty four and 509 of IPC. we’ve got all proof of the incident and that we can move to tribunal if correct action isn’t taken by police.
Satpute more aforementioned that in the shooting of a special dance variety, Patekar was touching Dutta unsuitably on the pretext of teaching her some steps.
According to PTI, Dutta, during a letter, aforementioned that before shooting the song, that was purported to be a solo song picturised solely on her, she had clearly mentioned that she is going to not enact or perform any lewd, vulgar or uncomfortable steps. However, on the fourth day of the shoot, Patekar’s behaviour was inappropriate as he was grabbing her by the arms and pushing her around on the pretext of teaching her some steps, the grievance aforementioned.
“When he was touching American state indecently and extra I felt terribly uncomfortable owing to his behaviour, I felt he has incensed my modesty,” the letter scan. Dutta even complained to the creator, producer and director hoping some action would be taken and everything would be fine. however to her surprise, new steps were introduced by Acharya, that were intimate and enclosed Patekar touching her unsuitably, she alleged.
The actor aforementioned she was being forced and pressurized to try to to the steps however when she refused, the producer vulnerable to smear her. “Everyone was taking the aspect of Patekar”, she said. She then known as her folks and manager, UN agency questioned Patekar’s actions. However, the producer refused to budge and Dutta had no selection however to go away the studio, the grievance aforementioned.
On the answer, her automotive was attacked however with the assistance of the police she managed to flee from the spot, it added. we tend to were then taken to the police office and my statement was recorded however not as per the grievance. several components of my grievance were deleted, omitted and avoided, she alleged. She conjointly lodged a grievance with CINTAA in March 2008.
“After the higher than incident i used to be underneath tremendous shock and that i suffered psychological trauma and was unable to require work and suffered a large financial loss in crores,” Dutta aforementioned within the letter.
On the opposite hand, Patekar, UN agency arrived in city when finishing the Rajasthan shoot of ‘Housefull 4’ on Saturday, refuted the allegations levelled on him locution, “I have already aforementioned what I had to mention ten years back. Lie continues to be a lie.”